Skradski v. Cleveland Cliffs Iron Co.

10 F.R.D. 393, 1950 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3670
CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio
DecidedMay 23, 1950
DocketCiv. No. 26165
StatusPublished

This text of 10 F.R.D. 393 (Skradski v. Cleveland Cliffs Iron Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Skradski v. Cleveland Cliffs Iron Co., 10 F.R.D. 393, 1950 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3670 (N.D. Ohio 1950).

Opinion

JONES, Chief Judge.

This is an action brought under favor of the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 688.

Plaintiff served four interrogatories upon defendant. Defendant objects to Interrogatory No. 1 insofar as it calls for the production of certain reports.

The objection is well taken. Fed. Rules Civ.Proc., rule 33, 28 U.S.C.A., does not provide for the production of documents. Plaintiff must make use of Rule 34 with its more stringent requirements if he wishes these reports produced.

The objection will be sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 688
46 U.S.C. § 688

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 F.R.D. 393, 1950 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/skradski-v-cleveland-cliffs-iron-co-ohnd-1950.