Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Skoy v. Enrico & Sons Contracting, Inc.

Skoy v. Enrico & Sons Contracting, Inc.

196 A.D.2d 839, 603 N.Y.S.2d 751, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8585
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 20, 1993
StatusPublished

This text of 196 A.D.2d 839 (Skoy v. Enrico & Sons Contracting, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Skoy v. Enrico & Sons Contracting, Inc., 196 A.D.2d 839, 603 N.Y.S.2d 751, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8585 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

In an action to recover legal fees, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.), dated June 10, 1991, which granted the defendants’ motion to vacate a judgment entered upon default.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We conclude that the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ motion to vacate the judgment (see, Furgang v Epstein, 106 AD2d 609). Bracken, J. P., Balletta, Eiber, O’Brien and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Furgang v. Epstein
106 A.D.2d 609 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
196 A.D.2d 839, 603 N.Y.S.2d 751, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/skoy-v-enrico-sons-contracting-inc-nyappdiv-1993.