Skotnicki, G. v. Insurance Department

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Skotnicki, G. v. Insurance Department

169 A.3d 24, 2017 WL 1131934, 2017 Pa. LEXIS 660

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 27, 2017·No. Skotnicki, G. v. Insurance Department - No. 650 MAL 2016 (Granted)·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of March, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as framed by Petitioner, is:

Whether the Commonwealth Court erred in its conclusion that the Department is not bound by the May 28, 2014 Department Investigative Report Order directing [Phoenix] to continue Petitioner’s coverage without a lapse in coverage?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of March, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as framed by Petitioner, is:

Whether the Commonwealth Court erred in its conclusion that the Department is not bound by the May 28, 2014 Department Investigative Report Order directing [Phoenix] to continue Petitioner’s coverage without a lapse in coverage?

Skotnicki, G. v. Insurance Department, 169 A.3d 24, 2017 WL 1131934, 2017 Pa. LEXIS 660 (Pa. 2017).

Pincite

169 A.3d 24 (Skotnicki, G. v. Insurance Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related