Skordilis v. La Quila Construction, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Skordilis v. La Quila Construction, Inc.

48 A.D.3d 667, 850 N.Y.S.2d 905

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 19, 2008

StatusPublished

This text of 48 A.D.3d 667 (Skordilis v. La Quila Construction, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Skordilis v. La Quila Construction, Inc., 48 A.D.3d 667, 850 N.Y.S.2d 905 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

In two related actions to recover damages for injury to property, the defendants La Quila Construction, Inc., and New York City Transit Authority appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rosengarten, J.), entered July 21, 2006, which, upon a jury verdict on the issue of liability, is in favor of the plaintiff John Skordilis and against them in the total sum of $631,327.06.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the defendants’ contention, a new trial on the issue of liability is not warranted (see Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129, 133 [1985]; Lagana v Fox, 6 AD3d 583 [2004]). Furthermore, the award of damages did not deviate “materially from what would be reasonable compensation” (CPLR 5501 [c]; see Christopher v Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., 76 NY2d 1003 [1990]). Mastro, J.P., Skelos, Florio and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In two related actions to recover damages for injury to property, the defendants La Quila Construction, Inc., and New York City Transit Authority appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rosengarten, J.), entered July 21, 2006, which, upon a jury verdict on the issue of liability, is in favor of the plaintiff John Skordilis and against them in the total sum of $631,327.06.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the defendants’ contention, a new trial on the issue of liability is not warranted (see Nicastro v Park, 113 AD2d 129, 133 [1985]; Lagana v Fox, 6 AD3d 583 [2004]). Furthermore, the award of damages did not deviate “materially from what would be reasonable compensation” (CPLR 5501 [c]; see Christopher v Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., 76 NY2d 1003 [1990]). Mastro, J.P., Skelos, Florio and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 A.D.3d 667, 850 N.Y.S.2d 905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/skordilis-v-la-quila-construction-inc-nyappdiv-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack