Skorcz v. Wells Fargo Bank
This text of Skorcz v. Wells Fargo Bank (Skorcz v. Wells Fargo Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
DIANA SKORCZ,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D17-2824
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., DUSTAN L. SKORCZ, RESIDENCES AT LAGO BUENDIA ASSOCIATION AND LAKE BUENDIA MASTER ASSOCIATION,
Appellees. /
Opinion filed June 22, 2018
Final Appeal from the Circuit Court for Osceola County, Margaret H. Schreiber, Judge.
Tanner Andrews, of Tanner Andrews, P.A., DeLand, for Appellant.
Sara F. Holladay-Tobias, Emily Y. Rottmann, and C.H. Houston III, of McGuirewoods LLP, Jacksonville, for Appellee, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
No Appearance for other Appellees.
ON CONFESSION OF ERROR
PER CURIAM.
Pursuant to Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s Confession of Error, we reverse the trial
court’s July 27, 2017 Final Judgment of Foreclosure and remand this matter to the trial
court for further proceedings. Appellant’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees, filed September 19, 2017, is provisionally granted should Appellant ultimately be determined to be the
prevailing party below. If so determined, the lower court shall determine and assess
reasonable attorney’s fees for this appellate court proceeding. See Fla. R. App. P.
9.400(a), (b).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
WALLIS, LAMBERT, and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Skorcz v. Wells Fargo Bank, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/skorcz-v-wells-fargo-bank-fladistctapp-2018.