Skopelos Seafood & Steak Restaurant, Inc. v. Estate of Silivos

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Skopelos Seafood & Steak Restaurant, Inc. v. Estate of Silivos

969 So. 2d 462, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 18165, 2007 WL 3375338

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 15, 2007

DocketNo. 1D07-4396

StatusPublished

This text of 969 So. 2d 462 (Skopelos Seafood & Steak Restaurant, Inc. v. Estate of Silivos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Skopelos Seafood & Steak Restaurant, Inc. v. Estate of Silivos, 969 So. 2d 462, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 18165, 2007 WL 3375338 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of September 20, 2007, the Court has determined that the appellant has prematurely filed the notice of appeal. The order grants summary judgment of all of the counts in the complaint in favor of the appellees, and grants partial summary judgment in favor of the appellees in the appellees’ counterclaim. In the order the court directs the parties to schedule further proceedings to determine damages and states that it will subsequently enter a final judgment. The court has indicated that its judicial labor will continue to be engaged in this lawsuit, and the unfinished business before the lower court concerns a counterclaim interrelated to, and arising out of, the same set of facts as the claims sought to be appealed by the appellant. See S.L.T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb, 304 So.2d 97, 99 [463]*463(Fla.1974); Irvine v. Southwood 1295, 948 So.2d 981 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). The appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

DISMISSED.

WOLF, POLSTON, and THOMAS, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of September 20, 2007, the Court has determined that the appellant has prematurely filed the notice of appeal. The order grants summary judgment of all of the counts in the complaint in favor of the appellees, and grants partial summary judgment in favor of the appellees in the appellees’ counterclaim. In the order the court directs the parties to schedule further proceedings to determine damages and states that it will subsequently enter a final judgment. The court has indicated that its judicial labor will continue to be engaged in this lawsuit, and the unfinished business before the lower court concerns a counterclaim interrelated to, and arising out of, the same set of facts as the claims sought to be appealed by the appellant. See S.L.T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb, 304 So.2d 97, 99 [463]*463(Fla.1974); Irvine v. Southwood 1295, 948 So.2d 981 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). The appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

DISMISSED.

WOLF, POLSTON, and THOMAS, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

969 So. 2d 462, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 18165, 2007 WL 3375338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/skopelos-seafood-steak-restaurant-inc-v-estate-of-silivos-fladistctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack