Skookum Packers' Ass'n v. Pacific Northwest Canning Co.

Customs and Patent Appeals

Skookum Packers' Ass'n v. Pacific Northwest Canning Co.

45 F.2d 915

CourtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals

DecidedDecember 19, 1930

DocketPatent Appeal No. 2523

StatusPublished

This text of 45 F.2d 915 (Skookum Packers' Ass'n v. Pacific Northwest Canning Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Customs and Patent Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Skookum Packers' Ass'n v. Pacific Northwest Canning Co., 45 F.2d 915 (ccpa 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

LENROOT, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal in a trade-mark opposition proceeding. The Commissioner of Patents held that appellant was estopped to oppose the registration sought by appellee, and reversed the decision of the Examiner of Trade-Mark Interferences, which sustained the notice of opposition and adjudged that appellee was not entitled to the registration sought by its application. From this decision of the Commissioner appellant takes this appeal.

The issues involved herein are substantially the same as those involved in the ease [916]*916between the same parties, 45 F.(2d) 912, Patent Appeal No. 2522, decided this day (Patents), and by stipulation of the parties the record in said last-named case became the record in the case at bar.

For the reasons given in our decision in said Patent Appeal No. 2522, the decision of the Commissioner of Patents is reversed.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LENROOT, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal in a trade-mark opposition proceeding. The Commissioner of Patents held that appellant was estopped to oppose the registration sought by appellee, and reversed the decision of the Examiner of Trade-Mark Interferences, which sustained the notice of opposition and adjudged that appellee was not entitled to the registration sought by its application. From this decision of the Commissioner appellant takes this appeal.

The issues involved herein are substantially the same as those involved in the ease [916]*916between the same parties, 45 F.(2d) 912, Patent Appeal No. 2522, decided this day (Patents), and by stipulation of the parties the record in said last-named case became the record in the case at bar.

For the reasons given in our decision in said Patent Appeal No. 2522, the decision of the Commissioner of Patents is reversed.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 F.2d 915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/skookum-packers-assn-v-pacific-northwest-canning-co-ccpa-1930.