Skoney v. Pittner

21 A.D.3d 1424, 801 N.Y.S.2d 202
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Skoney v. Pittner. Read the opinion of the Court — 21 A.D.3d 1422
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 30, 2005·No. Appeal No. 2·Published

Opinion

from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (David J. Mahoney, J.), entered November 18, 2004. The order denied plaintiffs’ motion for leave to renew, granted defendant’s motion for leave to renew and upon renewal granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by denying defendant’s motions and reinstating the complaint and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Skoney v Pittner (21 AD3d 1422 [2005]). Present—Green, J.P., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Skoney v. Pittner, 21 A.D.3d 1424, 801 N.Y.S.2d 202 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

21 A.D.3d 1424 (Skoney v. Pittner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Skoney v. Pittner
21 A.D.3d 1422 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)