Skolnik v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad

13 A.D.3d 350, 786 N.Y.S.2d 100, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14886
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 6, 2004·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (DiBlasi, J.), entered September 25, 2003, which denied that branch of her motion which was, in effect, to restore the action to the trial calendar.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by adding to the decretal paragraph thereof the words “as unnecessary” after the word “denied”; as so modified, the order is affirmed, with costs, and the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, is directed to schedule a conference date before the assigned Justice immediately upon being served with a copy of this decision and order by the appellant’s attorney.

By decision and order on motion dated April 6, 2004, this Court dismissed an appeal from a decision of the Supreme Court dated June 30, 2003, which purported to dismiss the complaint in this action. As no order was entered upon the decision, the Supreme Court’s ruling as embodied therein was without effect (see Petrie v Petrie, 144 AD2d 549 [1988], citing Talcott Factors v Larfred, Inc., 115 AD2d 397, 400 [1985]). Accordingly, that branch of the appellant’s motion which was, in effect, to restore the action to the trial calendar was unnecessary. Krausman, J.P., Luciano, Mastro and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Skolnik v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad, 13 A.D.3d 350, 786 N.Y.S.2d 100, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

13 A.D.3d 350 (Skolnik v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Charalabidis v. Elnagar
2020 NY Slip Op 04913 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)