Skolnick v. Fumo

261 A.D. 1002, 27 N.Y.S.2d 445, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8509
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 31, 1941·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order denying appellants’ motion, under section 1493, Civil Practice Act, for a transcript of the stenographer’s minutes, reversed on the facts, without costs, and the motion granted, without costs. On the facts appearing in the papers on appeal, which are undisputed, it appears that a prima facie case was established and that the complaint should not have been dismissed. A reading of the transcript of the whole evidence may disclose a contrary conclusion, but on the present papers we believe the motion should have been granted. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Skolnick v. Fumo, 261 A.D. 1002, 27 N.Y.S.2d 445, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8509 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

261 A.D. 1002 (Skolnick v. Fumo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rayano v. City of New York
285 A.D. 961 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1955)