Skokos v. Skokos
This text of 918 S.W.2d 721 (Skokos v. Skokos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Joseph Gelzine seeks access to records of trial in two cases decided by this Court, Skokos v. Gray, 318 Ark. 571, 886 S.W.2d 618 (1993) (Case No. 93-1079), and Skokos v. Skokos, 322 Ark. 563, 909 S.W.2d 653 (1994) (Case No. 94-952). Mr. Gelzine states he is a litigant in a separate case brought against him by Pamela F. Skokos involving evidence contained in the records requested. Ms. Skokos has responded to Mr. Gelzine’s motion for release of the transcripts to the effect that she has no objection.
In our per curiam order in Case No. 94-952 we granted a motion to chronologize and consolidate the records in the two cases. We remanded the consolidated case to the Trial Court and appointed Chancellor Jim R. Hannah to replace Chancellor Alice S. Gray who had recused.
The consolidated record sought in this motion is in the possession of Chancellor Hannah who is using it to conduct further proceedings in the case. Mr. Gelzine may make whatever arrangements Chancellor Hannah may permit for temporary access to and copying of the record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
918 S.W.2d 721, 324 Ark. 119, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/skokos-v-skokos-ark-1996.