Sklenar v. Weinstein
This text of 40 Misc. 2d 990 (Sklenar v. Weinstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The physician’s testimony below falls short of the required reasonably certain medical opinion on the vital issue of causation. It was prejudicial, reversible error, therefore, for the trial court to allow the jury to consider plaintiffs’ causally unrelated testimony regarding their alleged discomfort or difficulty in sexual relations.
The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant to abide the event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
40 Misc. 2d 990, 245 N.Y.S.2d 87, 1963 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sklenar-v-weinstein-nyappterm-1963.