Skiver v. State

920 S.W.2d 854, 324 Ark. 457, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 303
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedMay 20, 1996
DocketCR 96-527
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 920 S.W.2d 854 (Skiver v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Skiver v. State, 920 S.W.2d 854, 324 Ark. 457, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 303 (Ark. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

William Wesley Skiver, by his attorney, Jon A. Williams, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk. His attorney admits by motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam). The motion is therefore granted.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Dudley, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cole v. State
6 S.W.3d 805 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 1999)
Jacobs v. State
922 S.W.2d 344 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
920 S.W.2d 854, 324 Ark. 457, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/skiver-v-state-ark-1996.