Skirvin v. Board of Tax Appeals
This text of 155 Ohio St. (N.S.) 590 (Skirvin v. Board of Tax Appeals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Although a majority of the members of this court are of the opinion that Sections 5356 and [594]*5941078-36, General Code, are unconstitutional, two members of the court do not concur in that view.
Section 2, Article IV of the Constitution, provides in part: “No law shall be held unconstitutional and void by the Supreme Court without the concurrence of at least all but one of the judges, except in the affirm-, anee of a judgment of the Court of Appeals declaring a law unconstitutional and void.” The instant cases do not involve a judgment of that court declaring a law unconstitutional.
Five members of this court not being a sufficient number to declare Sections 5356 and 1078-36, General Code, unconstitutional, the real property in question is exempt from taxation.
Decision affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
155 Ohio St. (N.S.) 590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/skirvin-v-board-of-tax-appeals-ohio-1951.