Skipper v. State
This text of 650 So. 2d 967 (Skipper v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant, Lonnie Lamar Skipper, pleaded guilty to the theft of property in the second degree, a violation of § 13A-8-4, Code of Alabama 1975. His sentence of five years’ imprisonment was split, and he was placed on two years’ supervised probation, after completion of the disciplinary rehabilitation program, commonly referred to as “boot camp.”
The appellant did not complete boot camp because of medical problems. As a result, the court revoked the appellant’s probation and required him to serve the remainder of his five-year sentence.
The appellant contends that the court erred in not making written findings setting forth the evidence upon which it relied in revoking, and the specific reasons for revoking, his probation. Such a written statement is constitutionally required. Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 92 S.Ct. 2593, 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972); Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778, 93 S.Ct. 1756, 36 L.Ed.2d 656 (1973). See also Wyatt v. State, 608 So.2d 762 (Ala.1992); Grimes v. State, 579 So.2d 693 (Ala.Cr.App.1991).
Therefore, this ease is remanded to the Circuit Court for Baldwin County with directions that that court make written findings as required by Morrissey and Gagnon. A copy of the circuit court’s findings shall be filed with this court within 42 days from the date of this opinion.
REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
650 So. 2d 967, 1994 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 238, 1994 WL 264257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/skipper-v-state-alacrimapp-1994.