Skipper v. Mayor of Brunswick
This text of 114 S.E. 725 (Skipper v. Mayor of Brunswick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. “ A petition for certiorari to review the judgment of a police or recorder’s court, unless a pauper’s affidavit is made, must affirmatively allege (among other things) that the petitioner has filed with the clerk of that court, if it has a clerk, a bond payable, etc., and conditioned, etc., which has been approved and accepted by said cleric; and there should be attached to the petition a certified copy of the bond, together with a certificate from the clerk of the court that the bond was filed with him and was approved and accepted by him. Unless all these things appear, to wit, the aforesaid allegations in the petition, the certificate of the clerk of the court verifying them, and a certified copy of the bond given, the certiorari should not be sanctioned, and, if sanctioned, should be dismissed on the hearing.” Gillespie v. Mayor &c. of Macon, 19 Ga. App. 1 (90 S. E. 970), and citations.
2. Under the foregoing ruling the certiorari in the instant ease should not [186]*186have been sanctioned; but, having been sanctioned, the judge of the superior court committed no error in overruling it after a hearing upon its merits. The correct result was reached by the overruling of the certiorari. Gillespie v. Mayor &c. of Macon, supra, and citations.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
114 S.E. 725, 29 Ga. App. 185, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/skipper-v-mayor-of-brunswick-gactapp-1922.