Skinner v. Wheeling Pipe Line, Inc.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Skinner v. Wheeling Pipe Line, Inc.

159 So. 2d 317, 1963 La. App. LEXIS 2182

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedDecember 6, 1963

DocketNo. 10072

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 159 So. 2d 317 (Skinner v. Wheeling Pipe Line, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Skinner v. Wheeling Pipe Line, Inc., 159 So. 2d 317, 1963 La. App. LEXIS 2182 (La. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

GLADNEY, Judge.

This suit is a companion suit to Robert Holder v. Travelers Insurance Company, et al., La.App., 159 So.2d 292. The petitioners herein are Mrs. Edith Bidder Skinner, William Linfield Holder, Barner A. Holder, Edwin H. Holder and Mrs. Mary Evelyn Leonard, who seek recovery in damages against Wheeling Pipe Line, Inc. and Travelers Insurance Company, arising from [318]*318the death of their mother, Mrs. Lena B. Holder in an automobile collision on U. S. Highway 80 near Arcadia, Louisiana, on December 10, 1960.

All essential findings of fact and law are comprehended in the above referred to decision and govern the instant case. For the reasons stated therein, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed, at appellant’s cost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GLADNEY, Judge.

This suit is a companion suit to Robert Holder v. Travelers Insurance Company, et al., La.App., 159 So.2d 292. The petitioners herein are Mrs. Edith Bidder Skinner, William Linfield Holder, Barner A. Holder, Edwin H. Holder and Mrs. Mary Evelyn Leonard, who seek recovery in damages against Wheeling Pipe Line, Inc. and Travelers Insurance Company, arising from [318]*318the death of their mother, Mrs. Lena B. Holder in an automobile collision on U. S. Highway 80 near Arcadia, Louisiana, on December 10, 1960.

All essential findings of fact and law are comprehended in the above referred to decision and govern the instant case. For the reasons stated therein, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed, at appellant’s cost.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

159 So. 2d 317, 1963 La. App. LEXIS 2182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/skinner-v-wheeling-pipe-line-inc-lactapp-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack