Skinner v. Stocking
211 P. 1118, 36 Idaho 448, 1922 Ida. LEXIS 207
Opinion
The above case having been set down for hearing, appellant submitted no brief and was not represented. Respondents were represented by counsel. The court, after examining the record, finds no fundamental error which requires reversal. Accordingly the judgment is affirmed with costs to respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Skinner v. Stocking, 211 P. 1118, 36 Idaho 448, 1922 Ida. LEXIS 207 (Idaho 1922).
211 P. 1118 (Skinner v. Stocking) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.