Skinner v. Stocking
211 P. 1118, 36 Idaho 448, 1922 Ida. LEXIS 207
This text of 211 P. 1118 (Skinner v. Stocking) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Skinner v. Stocking, 211 P. 1118, 36 Idaho 448, 1922 Ida. LEXIS 207 (Idaho 1922).
Opinion
The above case having been set down for hearing, appellant submitted no brief and was not represented. Respondents were represented by counsel. The court, after examining the record, finds no fundamental error which requires reversal. Accordingly the judgment is affirmed with costs to respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
211 P. 1118, 36 Idaho 448, 1922 Ida. LEXIS 207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/skinner-v-stocking-idaho-1922.