Skinner v. State
498 So. 2d 618, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2543, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11232
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 5, 1986·No. No. BK-258·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
The appealed judgment imposing costs pursuant to sections 27.3455(1) and 960.20, Florida Statutes (1985), is reversed because the trial court failed to determine appellant’s indigency status at the time of the hearing. Hughes v. State, 497 So.2d 938, (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Slaughter v. State, 493 So.2d 1109 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Lawton v. State, 492 So.2d 404 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). We do not consider appellant’s ex post facto argument because it was not properly raised in the court below. Slaughter v. State, 493 So.2d 1109.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Skinner v. State, 498 So. 2d 618, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2543, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11232 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).
498 So. 2d 618 (Skinner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bostic v. State
504 So. 2d 794 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Amison v. State
504 So. 2d 473 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)