Skinner v. State

498 So. 2d 618, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2543, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11232
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 5, 1986
DocketNo. BK-258
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 498 So. 2d 618 (Skinner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Skinner v. State, 498 So. 2d 618, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2543, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11232 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appealed judgment imposing costs pursuant to sections 27.3455(1) and 960.20, Florida Statutes (1985), is reversed because the trial court failed to determine appellant’s indigency status at the time of the hearing. Hughes v. State, 497 So.2d 938, (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Slaughter v. State, 493 So.2d 1109 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Lawton v. State, 492 So.2d 404 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). We do not consider appellant’s ex post facto argument because it was not properly raised in the court below. Slaughter v. State, 493 So.2d 1109.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

BOOTH, C.J., and WENTWORTH and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bostic v. State
504 So. 2d 794 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Amison v. State
504 So. 2d 473 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
498 So. 2d 618, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2543, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/skinner-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.