Skinner v. State

400 So. 2d 1319, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20573
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Skinner v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 399 So. 2d 1064
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 15, 1981·No. No. 80-1137·Published

Opinion

SHARP, Judge.

Skinner was adjudged guilty of burglary and grand theft, and his sentence included a single five year term of imprisonment with credit for time previously served in jail. The sentence provided that eighteen (18) months were to be served in prison followed by three and one-half (3V2) years probation.

On appeal Skinner argues, and the State agrees, that his sentence is improper because it is a general sentence for two separate offenses. Dorfman v. State, 351 So.2d 954 (Fla.1977). Additionally, Skinner asserts that the terms of his split sentence are illegal in light of Villery v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 396 So.2d 1107 (Fla.1981). We agree with both of appellant’s arguments. Therefore we vacate the sentence and remand this case to the trial court for resentencing consistent with this opinion. Appellant shall be present at the resentencing proceeding.

REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.

ORFINGER and COWART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Skinner v. State, 400 So. 2d 1319, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20573 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

400 So. 2d 1319 (Skinner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dorfman v. State
351 So. 2d 954 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1977)
Villery v. Florida Parole & Probation Com'n
396 So. 2d 1107 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)