Skinner v. Somes
This text of 14 Mass. 107 (Skinner v. Somes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is the first attempt to maintain an action of debt by the assignee of a bond in his own name. The word assigns has been for centuries inserted in bonds and obligations; but no one has conceived that it gave to them a negotiable property, so as to transfer the right of action upon them to the assignee. In Fenner vs. Mears, the action was assumpsit upon the promise of the obligor to pay to the assignee; and the assignment of a chose in action was always a good consideration for a promise.
We have gone as far in favor of assignments as the authorities or the reason of them would justify us. But to support the present action would be to disregard settled and established rules, founded on sound principles of law, and the highest reason,
Declaration adjudged, bad.
[Day vs. Whitney, 1 Pick. 503. — Dunn vs. Snell & Al. 15 M.481.— Ed.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 Mass. 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/skinner-v-somes-mass-1817.