Skinner v. Civil Service Commission
This text of 204 P.3d 215 (Skinner v. Civil Service Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Roger L. SKINNER, Respondent,
v.
CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION of the City of Medina, the City of Medina, a municipal corporation, Medina Police Department, Petitioners.
Supreme Court of Washington.
ORDER
¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Alexander and Justices Madsen, Chambers, Fairhurst and Stephens, at its March 31, 2009, Motion Calendar, considered whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.
¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:
¶ 3 That the Petition for Review is granted. The Respondent's motion to strike reply to answer is also granted.
For the Court /s/ Gerry L. Alexander CHIEF JUSTICEFree access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
204 P.3d 215, 165 Wash. 2d 1040, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/skinner-v-civil-service-commission-wash-2009.