Skinner v. Civil Service Commission
204 P.3d 215, 165 Wash. 2d 1040
Opinion
Roger L. SKINNER, Respondent,
v.
CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION of the City of Medina, the City of Medina, a municipal corporation, Medina Police Department, Petitioners.
Supreme Court of Washington.
ORDER
¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Alexander and Justices Madsen, Chambers, Fairhurst and Stephens, at its March 31, 2009, Motion Calendar, considered whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.
¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:
¶ 3 That the Petition for Review is granted. The Respondent's motion to strike reply to answer is also granted.
For the Court /s/ Gerry L. Alexander CHIEF JUSTICEFree access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Skinner v. Civil Service Commission, 204 P.3d 215, 165 Wash. 2d 1040 (Wash. 2009).
204 P.3d 215 (Skinner v. Civil Service Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Skinner v. Civil Service Commission
168 Wash. 2d 845 (Washington Supreme Court, 2010)
Skinner v. CIVIL SERVICE COM'N
232 P.3d 558 (Washington Supreme Court, 2010)
State v. Faagata
204 P.3d 215 (Washington Supreme Court, 2009)