Skinner v. . Badham

80 N.C. 14
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 5, 1879
StatusPublished

This text of 80 N.C. 14 (Skinner v. . Badham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Skinner v. . Badham, 80 N.C. 14 (N.C. 1879).

Opinion

Dillard, J.

The defendants appealed from Chowan superior court to the June term, 1878, of this court, and on their motion, a writ of certiorari was issued to bring up the record. In answer to the writ, a transcript is certified and filed during the present term, and thereupon the plaintiff moves to dismiss the appeal, because it does not appear to have been taken and perfected according to law, and the defendants move for a new writ of certiorari.

Erom the transcript it does not appear that any appeal *15 was taken. There is no entry of appeal taken of record, no notice of appeal, no appeal bond, and no statement of a case of appeal; and there being no proof by affidavit or otherwise, that any appeal was ever taken, or if taken, no suggestion made whj' it does not appear in the transcript already sent to this court,the motion of defendants for another writ of certiorari is refused.

The motion of plaintiff to dismiss the appeal is sustained.

Per Curiam. Appeal .dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 N.C. 14, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/skinner-v-badham-nc-1879.