Skinner (Roderick) v. The Second Jud. Dist. Ct.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
RODERICK STEPHEN SKINNER, No. 84894 Petitioner, vs. THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT FILE
COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, JUL 29 2022 IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF
ELIZABETH A. BROWN
WASHOE, CLERK OF SUTREME COURT
5
BY
Res • ondent. DEPUTY CLER -1( .-
ORDER DENYING PETITION
This pro se original petition for a writ of mandamus seeks to compel the district court to reassign petitioner's postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus to a different department and conduct a new evidentiary hearing. Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. See NRS 34.170; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 88 P.3d 840, 841 (2004) (writ relief is proper only when there is no plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law and the petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that writ relief is warranted). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.
Parraguirre
, J.
Hardesty Stiglich
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) I 947A 440rD , cc: Roderick Stephen Skinner Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
2
(01 1947A
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Skinner (Roderick) v. The Second Jud. Dist. Ct. (Skinner (Roderick) v. The Second Jud. Dist. Ct.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.