Skilmart's of East Meadow, Inc. v. Mayer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Skilmart's of East Meadow, Inc. v. Mayer

70 A.D.2d 597, 415 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12012

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 7, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 70 A.D.2d 597 (Skilmart's of East Meadow, Inc. v. Mayer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Skilmart's of East Meadow, Inc. v. Mayer, 70 A.D.2d 597, 415 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12012 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel respondent Mayer to issue a stop work order enjoining construction of a shopping center, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered November 3, 1978, which, inter alia, directed Mayer, in his capacity as Building Commissioner and Inspector of the Town of Hempstead, to issue a stop work order suspending all construction by appellants until they comply with the amended building zone ordinance. Appeal dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements. Subsequent to Special Term’s decision herein, appellants procured a variance of the off-street parking requirements of the amended building zone ordinance and were allowed to complete construction of the shopping center. This appeal is thereby rendered academic. Suozzi, J. P., Lazer, Gulotta, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel respondent Mayer to issue a stop work order enjoining construction of a shopping center, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered November 3, 1978, which, inter alia, directed Mayer, in his capacity as Building Commissioner and Inspector of the Town of Hempstead, to issue a stop work order suspending all construction by appellants until they comply with the amended building zone ordinance. Appeal dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements. Subsequent to Special Term’s decision herein, appellants procured a variance of the off-street parking requirements of the amended building zone ordinance and were allowed to complete construction of the shopping center. This appeal is thereby rendered academic. Suozzi, J. P., Lazer, Gulotta, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 A.D.2d 597, 415 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12012, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/skilmarts-of-east-meadow-inc-v-mayer-nyappdiv-1979.