Skidmore v. Pittsburg, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co.

112 U.S. 33, 5 S. Ct. 9, 28 L. Ed. 626, 1884 U.S. LEXIS 1849
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 27, 1884
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 112 U.S. 33 (Skidmore v. Pittsburg, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Skidmore v. Pittsburg, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co., 112 U.S. 33, 5 S. Ct. 9, 28 L. Ed. 626, 1884 U.S. LEXIS 1849 (1884).

Opinion

*36 Mr. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court. He stated the facts in the.foregoing language and continued : •

■ ’ The judgment "below was clearly right. The Columbus, Chicago &, Indiana Central Company was, in equity, the owner of the property when the lease was made and when the Pittsburg, Cincinnati & St. Louis Company went into possession under it. The deed executed in February, 1872, pursuant to the contract of purchase, converted the equitable title of the Columbus, Chicago & Indiana Central Company into a legal title, which at once, by operation of law, inured to the benefit of the Pittsburg, Cincinnati & St. Louis Company under .its lease. All the rights of William B. Skidmore, as against1 the property, accrued long after those of tho Pitts-burg, Cincinnati &. St. Louis Company and are subject to tho title of that company. Such being the case, it is entirely unnecessary to inquire whether the Skidmores acquired a valid title to the property as against the Columbus, Chicago & Indiana Central Company. The Pittsburg, Cincinnati & St. Louis Company is entitled to the possession, whether that title be good or bad.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

D. A. C. Uranium Co. v. Benton
149 F. Supp. 667 (D. Colorado, 1956)
Consolidated Mercantile Industries, Inc. v. Hirsch
198 Misc. 677 (New York Supreme Court, 1950)
Tebbs v. Union Realty Corp.
286 F. 1011 (District of Columbia, 1923)
Brown v. Barker
1912 OK 661 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Poultney v. Emerson
84 A. 53 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1912)
Skidmore v. Pittsburg, C. & St. LR Co.
112 U.S. 33 (Supreme Court, 1884)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 U.S. 33, 5 S. Ct. 9, 28 L. Ed. 626, 1884 U.S. LEXIS 1849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/skidmore-v-pittsburg-cincinnati-st-louis-railway-co-scotus-1884.