Skidmore v. Emanuel Hospital

562 P.2d 1248, 29 Or. App. 269, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 2256
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedApril 20, 1977
DocketNo. A-76-08-10715, CA 7058
StatusPublished

This text of 562 P.2d 1248 (Skidmore v. Emanuel Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Skidmore v. Emanuel Hospital, 562 P.2d 1248, 29 Or. App. 269, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 2256 (Or. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

[271]*271PER CURIAM.

The sole issue on appeal is a factual determination whether claimant suffered a second injury or whether her condition was an aggravation of a previous injury. We concur with the finding of the circuit court, the Workmen’s Compensation Board and the referee that there was no second injury.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
562 P.2d 1248, 29 Or. App. 269, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 2256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/skidmore-v-emanuel-hospital-orctapp-1977.