Skidmore v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

Fourth Circuit

Skidmore v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

181 F. App'x 383

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 22, 2006·No. No. 06-1080·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Charles O. Skidmore seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See Skidmore v. Dir., Office of Workers’ Comp. Prog., No. 05-552-BLA [384]*384(BRB Nov. 80, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Charles O. Skidmore seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See Skidmore v. Dir., Office of Workers’ Comp. Prog., No. 05-552-BLA [384]*384(BRB Nov. 80, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Skidmore v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, 181 F. App'x 383 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

181 F. App'x 383 (Skidmore v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related