Skidmore v. Desdoity

2 Johns. Cas. 77
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1800·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In the case of ¡Seton and others v. Low, (1 Johns. Cas. 1,) it was decided, that an insurance on lawful goods extended to all goods which it Was lawful by the Jaws of this country to export, and that.the insured was not bound to disclose to the insurer that the-^pods were of the description of contraband of war. "Whatever effect the difference of premium might have, to do ¿Way the presumption that the insurer took upon himself the risk of goods of this description without a special disclosure, the stipulation [78]*78in the policy that the insurance was against all risks, must remove all doubt.

In the case of Goix v. Knox, (1 Johns. Cas. 337,) it was decided, that an insurance against all risks, protects the insured against every loss happening during the voyage, except such as may arise from the fraud of the insured. According to these decisions, the policy must be considered as covering all goods lawful to be exported, whatever may be their quality, or whoever may be owner. We are, therefore, of opinion, that the plaintiffs must have judgment.

Judgment for the plaintiffs.(

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Skidmore v. Desdoity, 2 Johns. Cas. 77 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1800).

2 Johns. Cas. 77 (Skidmore v. Desdoity) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Atlantic Fruit Co. v. Solari
238 F. 217 (S.D. New York, 1916)
Bulkley v. Protection Ins. Co.
4 F. Cas. 614 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut, 1835)