Skidmore v. Desdoity

2 Johns. Cas. 77
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1800
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2 Johns. Cas. 77 (Skidmore v. Desdoity) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Skidmore v. Desdoity, 2 Johns. Cas. 77 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1800).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In the case of ¡Seton and others v. Low, (1 Johns. Cas. 1,) it was decided, that an insurance on lawful goods extended to all goods which it Was lawful by the Jaws of this country to export, and that.the insured was not bound to disclose to the insurer that the-^pods were of the description of contraband of war. "Whatever effect the difference of premium might have, to do ¿Way the presumption that the insurer took upon himself the risk of goods of this description without a special disclosure, the stipulation [78]*78in the policy that the insurance was against all risks, must remove all doubt.

In the case of Goix v. Knox, (1 Johns. Cas. 337,) it was decided, that an insurance against all risks, protects the insured against every loss happening during the voyage, except such as may arise from the fraud of the insured. According to these decisions, the policy must be considered as covering all goods lawful to be exported, whatever may be their quality, or whoever may be owner. We are, therefore, of opinion, that the plaintiffs must have judgment.

Judgment for the plaintiffs.(

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Atlantic Fruit Co. v. Solari
238 F. 217 (S.D. New York, 1916)
Bulkley v. Protection Ins. Co.
4 F. Cas. 614 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut, 1835)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Johns. Cas. 77, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/skidmore-v-desdoity-nysupct-1800.