Skidelsky v. Rosenbloom
This text of 155 N.Y.S. 616 (Skidelsky v. Rosenbloom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion denied. The order for examination before trial complies with the requirements of section 872 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and- therefore should not be disturbed. The mere fact that plaintiff can obtain the information sought of the defendant by the examination from other sources is no reason why the order should be disturbed. Personal knowledge of the plaintiff, or the fact that she has other evidence of the issue is no bar to her examining her adversary under section 870 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Richards v. Whiting, 127 App. Div. 208, 111 N. Y. Supp. 21.
Order signed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
155 N.Y.S. 616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/skidelsky-v-rosenbloom-nynyccityct-1915.