Skic v. Beverage Transportation Corp.
708 N.W.2d 784, 2006 Minn. LEXIS 53, 2006 WL 241132
Opinion
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed October 6, 2005, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
BY THE COURT:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Skic v. Beverage Transportation Corp., 708 N.W.2d 784, 2006 Minn. LEXIS 53, 2006 WL 241132 (Mich. 2006).
708 N.W.2d 784 (Skic v. Beverage Transportation Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)