Skic v. Beverage Transportation Corp.

708 N.W.2d 784, 2006 Minn. LEXIS 53, 2006 WL 241132
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedJanuary 30, 2006
DocketA05-2178
StatusPublished

This text of 708 N.W.2d 784 (Skic v. Beverage Transportation Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Skic v. Beverage Transportation Corp., 708 N.W.2d 784, 2006 Minn. LEXIS 53, 2006 WL 241132 (Mich. 2006).

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed October 6, 2005, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/Alan C. Page Associate Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
708 N.W.2d 784, 2006 Minn. LEXIS 53, 2006 WL 241132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/skic-v-beverage-transportation-corp-minn-2006.