Skibinski v. Cardenas

503 N.E.2d 1376, 69 N.Y.2d 661, 511 N.Y.S.2d 839, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 21262
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 16, 1986
StatusPublished

This text of 503 N.E.2d 1376 (Skibinski v. Cardenas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Skibinski v. Cardenas, 503 N.E.2d 1376, 69 N.Y.2d 661, 511 N.Y.S.2d 839, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 21262 (N.Y. 1986).

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does, not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (NY Const, art VI, § 3; CPLR 5602), and upon the further ground that this court does not have jurisdiction to entertain a motion for leave to appeal from an order of the Appellate Division entered in an action originating in a court other than those specified in CPLR 5602 (a) (1) (see also, NY Const, art VI, § 3 [b] [7]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 5602
New York CVP § 5602

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
503 N.E.2d 1376, 69 N.Y.2d 661, 511 N.Y.S.2d 839, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 21262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/skibinski-v-cardenas-ny-1986.