Skerry v. Lamb
This text of 432 P.2d 792 (Skerry v. Lamb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On July 9, 1964, Zelma Lamb and Drew Lamb gave a note and mortgage for $60,000 to a trustee for the benefit of their son. Five days later the makers of the note suffered a not unexpected judgment in the sum of $1,740,000. In this proceeding by the trustee to foreclose the mortgage, the trial court held the note and mortgage to be void because in fraud of creditors. The trustee appeals.
The issues were primarily factual and the evidence tended to prove that the defendants Lamb executed the note and mortgage in an effort to put the property beyond the reach of their creditors.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
432 P.2d 792, 248 Or. 147, 1967 Ore. LEXIS 388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/skerry-v-lamb-or-1967.