Skene v. Wragg
6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 374
This text of 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 374 (Skene v. Wragg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Skene v. Wragg, 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 374 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1735).
Opinion
Upon Debating the Matter and Hearing of Council learned on both Sides, This Court is of Opinion That the Complainants Bill doth not Contain Sufficient Matter of Equity, And therefore Order the Said Rule may be Dismissed, And that each Party Do pay their own Costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/skene-v-wragg-ctchansc-1735.