Skene v. Wragg
6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 374
Opinion
Upon Debating the Matter and Hearing of Council learned on both Sides, This Court is of Opinion That the Complainants Bill doth not Contain Sufficient Matter of Equity, And therefore Order the Said Rule may be Dismissed, And that each Party Do pay their own Costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Skene v. Wragg, 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 374 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1735).
6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 374 (Skene v. Wragg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.