Skene v. Wragg

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 374
Court of Chancery of South Carolina·Decided May 30, 1735·Published

Opinion

Upon Debating the Matter and Hearing of Council learned on both Sides, This Court is of Opinion That the Complainants Bill doth not Contain Sufficient Matter of Equity, And therefore Order the Said Rule may be Dismissed, And that each Party Do pay their own Costs.

Alexr Stewart Deputy Register in Chancery

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Skene v. Wragg, 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 374 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1735).

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 374 (Skene v. Wragg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.