Skelton Motor Co. v. Brown

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Skelton Motor Co. v. Brown

332 S.W.2d 607, 231 Ark. 801, 1960 Ark. LEXIS 318

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedMarch 7, 1960

Docket5-2043

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 332 S.W.2d 607 (Skelton Motor Co. v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Skelton Motor Co. v. Brown, 332 S.W.2d 607, 231 Ark. 801, 1960 Ark. LEXIS 318 (Ark. 1960).

Pincite

Opinions

George Rose Smith, J.

This' is an action by the appellant upon an installment note executed by the appellees in payment for motor vehicle equipment. The defendants demurred fo the complaint on the ground that the note appears on its face to be usurious. The trial court sustained the demurrer and dismissed the complaint.

It is conceded that the appellees’ original principal debt was $3,000.00. . To evidence this obligation the seller prepared a note for $3,322.08, dated February 23, 1957, .payable in monthly installments of $138.42 beginning on April 1, 1957, and reciting that the interest was prepaid until maturity. The court’s finding of usury was based upon, a statement by counsel that the matter had been submitted to an accounting firm “to determine whether or not $322.08 exceeded interest on $3,000.00 at the rate of 10 per cent per annum for a period of 24 months, interest and principal to be repaid in 24 equal installments of $138.42 each. ’ ’ The accountants reported that the charge exceeded 10 per cent per annum, though their computations are not in the record.

It is readily demonstrable that the accountants’ conclusion was incorrect, for the note is not usurious. A standard work on interest tables states that at 10 per cent interest vthe monthly installments upon .a loan of $3,000.00, payable in 24 months, should be $138.43. Lake’s Monthly Installment and Interest Tables (5th Ed.), p. 145. Here the amount of each payment was a cent less than the permissible maximum.

Furthermore, the fact that the first installment upon the note in controversy was not due until 37 days after the date of the note increases the margin by which the interest falls below the legal limit. If this installment note had been for $3,000.00, with interest at 10 per cent per annum, the payments called for would have been applied as follows:

[[Image here]]

It will be observed that an interest charge of $329.50 might have been made; hence the actual exaction- of $322.08 was not excessive.

Reversed, the demurrer to be overruled.

McFaddin, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

George Rose Smith, J.

This' is an action by the appellant upon an installment note executed by the appellees in payment for motor vehicle equipment. The defendants demurred fo the complaint on the ground that the note appears on its face to be usurious. The trial court sustained the demurrer and dismissed the complaint.

It is conceded that the appellees’ original principal debt was $3,000.00. . To evidence this obligation the seller prepared a note for $3,322.08, dated February 23, 1957, .payable in monthly installments of $138.42 beginning on April 1, 1957, and reciting that the interest was prepaid until maturity. The court’s finding of usury was based upon, a statement by counsel that the matter had been submitted to an accounting firm “to determine whether or not $322.08 exceeded interest on $3,000.00 at the rate of 10 per cent per annum for a period of 24 months, interest and principal to be repaid in 24 equal installments of $138.42 each. ’ ’ The accountants reported that the charge exceeded 10 per cent per annum, though their computations are not in the record.

It is readily demonstrable that the accountants’ conclusion was incorrect, for the note is not usurious. A standard work on interest tables states that at 10 per cent interest vthe monthly installments upon .a loan of $3,000.00, payable in 24 months, should be $138.43. Lake’s Monthly Installment and Interest Tables (5th Ed.), p. 145. Here the amount of each payment was a cent less than the permissible maximum.

Furthermore, the fact that the first installment upon the note in controversy was not due until 37 days after the date of the note increases the margin by which the interest falls below the legal limit. If this installment note had been for $3,000.00, with interest at 10 per cent per annum, the payments called for would have been applied as follows:

[[Image here]]

It will be observed that an interest charge of $329.50 might have been made; hence the actual exaction- of $322.08 was not excessive.

Reversed, the demurrer to be overruled.

McFaddin, J., concurs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

332 S.W.2d 607, 231 Ark. 801, 1960 Ark. LEXIS 318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/skelton-motor-co-v-brown-ark-1960.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack