Skelcey v. Detroit Estates Corp.
This text of 239 N.W. 386 (Skelcey v. Detroit Estates Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissal of amended bill of complaint was declined. Defendants have appealed. Facts are stated in companion case ofHall v. Detroit Estates Corporation, ante, 121, decision of which is here controlling.
Reversed. Costs to appellants. Cause remanded with direction to permit transfer to the law side within 20 days, and on failure so to transfer, to dismiss the bill.
WIEST, McDONALD, POTTER, SHARPE, NORTH, and FEAD, JJ., concurred. BUTZEL, C.J., did not sit. *Page 127
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
239 N.W. 386, 256 Mich. 125, 1931 Mich. LEXIS 1030, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/skelcey-v-detroit-estates-corp-mich-1931.