SKEK ASSOCIATES v. Benenson
857 N.E.2d 531, 7 N.Y.3d 843, 824 N.Y.S.2d 209, 2006 N.Y. LEXIS 2674
Opinion
Motion, insofar as made by Esther Benenson, Michael Benenson and Sharon Benenson for leave to appeal, dismissed upon the ground that they are not parties aggrieved (CPLR 5511); motion, insofar as made by Flushing Manor Care Center, Inc. for leave to appeal, denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
SKEK ASSOCIATES v. Benenson, 857 N.E.2d 531, 7 N.Y.3d 843, 824 N.Y.S.2d 209, 2006 N.Y. LEXIS 2674 (N.Y. 2006).
857 N.E.2d 531 (SKEK ASSOCIATES v. Benenson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
LM BUSINESS ASSOCIATES, INC. v. STATE OF NEW YORK
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015
LM Business Associates, Inc. v. State
124 A.D.3d 1215 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Richards v. Tompkins County
82 A.D.3d 1323 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Farrington
51 A.D.3d 1221 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Tadasky Corp. v. Village of Ellenville
45 A.D.3d 1131 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Eastern Niagara Project Power Alliance v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
42 A.D.3d 857 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)