Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Skeet v. Rashid

Skeet v. Rashid

124 A.D.2d 1035, 508 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62386
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 10, 1986
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 124 A.D.2d 1035 (Skeet v. Rashid) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Skeet v. Rashid, 124 A.D.2d 1035, 508 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62386 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

Memorandum: Defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint is governed by CPLR 3216 (e), which requires plaintiffs to show a justifiable excuse for failing to file a note of issue subsequent to service upon them of a 90-day demand, and a meritorious cause of action. Plaintiffs failed to meet either of these requirements and it was an abuse of discretion for Special Term to deny the motion (MacLeod v Nolte, 106 AD2d 860, 861). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Gossel, J. —dismiss complaint.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Green, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. Golub Corp.
178 A.D.2d 988 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Reed v. Duemmer
168 A.D.2d 1002 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Kennedy v. Henry Holland, Inc.
145 A.D.2d 964 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Granville v. R. E. Rappold Trucking Co.
134 A.D.2d 914 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
124 A.D.2d 1035, 508 N.Y.S.2d 761, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/skeet-v-rashid-nyappdiv-1986.