Skeen v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

231 So. 2d 209, 1970 Fla. LEXIS 2850
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 4, 1970
DocketNo. 37997
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 231 So. 2d 209 (Skeen v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Skeen v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 231 So. 2d 209, 1970 Fla. LEXIS 2850 (Fla. 1970).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission, now Industrial Relations Commission.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose, and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10(e), 32 F.S.A.

We conclude from our consideration of the petition, record and briefs, that the or[210]*210der of the Commission, except that portion relating to determination of attorneys fee, must be quashed on authority of the decision of this Court in Brown v. Griffin, 229 So.2d 225 (Fla.1969), and the cause remanded with directions that the matter be returned to the Judge of Industrial Claims for further findings of fact on the evidence already taken, in compliance with our opinions in Brown v. Griffin, supra, and Hardy v. City of Tarpon Springs, 81 So.2d 503 (Fla.1955).

Petitioner’s application for attorneys fees is granted in the amount of $250.00.

It is so ordered.

ERVIN, C. J., and DREW, CARLTON, ADKINS and BOYD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Skeen v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
254 So. 2d 783 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
231 So. 2d 209, 1970 Fla. LEXIS 2850, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/skeen-v-great-atlantic-pacific-tea-co-fla-1970.