Skedel v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.

51 A.D.2d 564, 378 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10829

This text of 51 A.D.2d 564 (Skedel v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Skedel v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc., 51 A.D.2d 564, 378 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10829 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendant Louis Waldman, Jr., Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 4, 1975, as, upon granting its motion to dismiss the complaint for want of prosecution, did so conditionally. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion granted unconditionally. The motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3216 should have been granted unconditionally (McKay v Smithtown Gen. Hosp., 42 AD2d 594; Chodikoff v Troy Estates, 37 AD2d 670). Gulotta, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Latham and Margett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chodikoff v. Troy Estates, Inc.
37 A.D.2d 670 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1971)
McKay v. Smithtown General Hospital
42 A.D.2d 594 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 A.D.2d 564, 378 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/skedel-v-consolidated-edison-co-of-new-york-inc-nyappdiv-1976.