Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Skedel v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.

Skedel v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.

51 A.D.2d 564, 378 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10829
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 19, 1976·Published

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendant Louis Waldman, Jr., Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 4, 1975, as, upon granting its motion to dismiss the complaint for want of prosecution, did so conditionally. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion granted unconditionally. The motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3216 should have been granted unconditionally (McKay v Smithtown Gen. Hosp., 42 AD2d 594; Chodikoff v Troy Estates, 37 AD2d 670). Gulotta, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Latham and Margett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Skedel v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc., 51 A.D.2d 564, 378 N.Y.S.2d 744, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10829 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

51 A.D.2d 564 (Skedel v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chodikoff v. Troy Estates, Inc.
37 A.D.2d 670 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1971)
McKay v. Smithtown General Hospital
42 A.D.2d 594 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1973)