Skavina v. Skavina

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Skavina v. Skavina

41 A.2d 611, 93 N.H. 335, 1945 N.H. LEXIS 126

CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire

DecidedMarch 6, 1945

DocketNo. 3518.

StatusPublished

This text of 41 A.2d 611 (Skavina v. Skavina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Skavina v. Skavina, 41 A.2d 611, 93 N.H. 335, 1945 N.H. LEXIS 126 (N.H. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition alleges sufficient grounds for annulment. However, we deem it inexpedient to consider at this time the numerous allegations of fraud, some of which may not be sustained by the evidence. The contention that the plaintiff does not come into equity with “clean hands” is not conclusive. See 16 Minn. Law Rev. 215.

Exception sustained.

Branch, J., was absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The petition alleges sufficient grounds for annulment. However, we deem it inexpedient to consider at this time the numerous allegations of fraud, some of which may not be sustained by the evidence. The contention that the plaintiff does not come into equity with “clean hands” is not conclusive. See 16 Minn. Law Rev. 215.

Exception sustained.

Branch, J., was absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 A.2d 611, 93 N.H. 335, 1945 N.H. LEXIS 126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/skavina-v-skavina-nh-1945.