Skannal v. Skannal

637 So. 2d 1067, 1994 La. LEXIS 1280
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided May 13, 1994·No. No. 94-C-0697·Published

Opinion

In re Skannal, Nena Grace Gould; — Plaintiffs); applying for Writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Nos. 25467-CA, 26030-CA; Parish of Bossier, 26th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 84,878.

Denied.

LEMMON, J., concurs in the denial, but disagrees with respondent’s argument (quoted by the court of appeal) that the uncorroborated testimony of one spouse will never constitute a preponderance of the evidence on the issue of fault.

DENNIS, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Skannal v. Skannal, 637 So. 2d 1067, 1994 La. LEXIS 1280 (La. 1994).

637 So. 2d 1067 (Skannal v. Skannal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.