Skahan v. Slocum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Skahan v. Slocum

21 A.D.2d 803, 252 N.Y.S.2d 260, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3577

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 10, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 21 A.D.2d 803 (Skahan v. Slocum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Skahan v. Slocum, 21 A.D.2d 803, 252 N.Y.S.2d 260, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3577 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, to review a determination of the respondent Rockland County Board of Supervisors, made December 26, 1963 after public hearing, establishing the Rockland County Sewer District No. 1. By order of the Supreme Court, Rock-land County, made April 3, 1964 pursuant to statute (CPLR 7804, subd. [g]), the proceeding has been transferred to this court for disposition. Determination confirmed, without costs (see Matter of Noyes v. Slocum, 21 A D 2d 802). Motion by petitioners for a trial by jury, a pretrial examination of respondents Mundt and Slocum and for leave to file a posttrial supplemental brief, denied. Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, to review a determination of the respondent Rockland County Board of Supervisors, made December 26, 1963 after public hearing, establishing the Rockland County Sewer District No. 1. By order of the Supreme Court, Rock-land County, made April 3, 1964 pursuant to statute (CPLR 7804, subd. [g]), the proceeding has been transferred to this court for disposition. Determination confirmed, without costs (see Matter of Noyes v. Slocum, 21 A D 2d 802). Motion by petitioners for a trial by jury, a pretrial examination of respondents Mundt and Slocum and for leave to file a posttrial supplemental brief, denied. Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 A.D.2d 803, 252 N.Y.S.2d 260, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3577, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/skahan-v-slocum-nyappdiv-1964.