Skaggs v. Philpot
This text of 7 Ky. Op. 457 (Skaggs v. Philpot) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
Philpot purchased from Beauchamp long before Skaggs. He held a bond for title, and assumed the right to enter upon and occupy at least a portion of the land in controversy immediately after his purchase.
The land adjoined other land claimed by him, and upon which he resided. By operation of law his possession was extended so as to embrace the land bought from Beauchamp. The testimony conduces very strongly to show that Skaggs knew before he purchased that Philpot was setting up claim to the land. He had such notice as would have put a reasonably prudent man upon inquiry.
His claim must therefore yield to that of Philpot. This is not a proceeding to quiet title, but an action to perfect title and acquire possession.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 Ky. Op. 457, 1874 Ky. LEXIS 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/skaggs-v-philpot-kyctapp-1874.