Skag-Way, Inc. v. Douglas

133 N.W.2d 12, 178 Neb. 290, 1965 Neb. LEXIS 698
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 11, 1965
DocketNo. 35808
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 133 N.W.2d 12 (Skag-Way, Inc. v. Douglas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Skag-Way, Inc. v. Douglas, 133 N.W.2d 12, 178 Neb. 290, 1965 Neb. LEXIS 698 (Neb. 1965).

Opinion

Spencer, J.

This is an action filed in the district court for Lancaster County by Skag-Way, Inc., doing business as O. P. Skaggs, a corporation, against the county attorney and the sheriff of Lancaster County, Nebraska, to declare Legislative Bill 710-, enacted by the Seventy-third Session of the Legislature of the State of Nebraska, Laws 1963, c. 392, p. 1242, hereinafter referred to as L. B. 710, void and unconstitutional, and to enjoin the defendants from enforcing its provisions against the plaintiff. Fifteen retail merchants were permitted to intervene in support of L. B. 710.

The trial court, on March 25, 1964, held L. B. 710 to be unconstitutional and void. Defendants and the interveners perfected this appeal.

Essentially, two questions are involved: First, is L. B. 710 a valid enactment; and second, if portions of L. B. 710 are found to be invalid, are such portions sever-able from the remainder of the act, thus leaving that valid remainder in force?

Both questions have heretofore been decided by this court. Pending this appeal, and on July 3, 1964, we filed the opinion in Terry Carpenter, Inc. v. Wood, 177 Neb. 515, 129 N. W. 2d 475, holding L. B. 710 to be null, void, and unconstitutional, and specifically holding that the invalid portions of the act were so interwoven with the rest that the doctrine of severability was not applicable. We adhere to that opinion, which is controlling herein.

[292]*292. The judgment of the trial court should be and hereby is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Boslaugh, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Plucknett v. Morrison
133 N.W.2d 18 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 N.W.2d 12, 178 Neb. 290, 1965 Neb. LEXIS 698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/skag-way-inc-v-douglas-neb-1965.