S.K. v. K.K.

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 1, 2017·No. 2D16-4542·Published

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

In the Interest of B.K., a child. ) ___________________________________) ) S.K., ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-4542 ) K.K., DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND ) FAMILIES, and GUARDIAN AD LITEM ) PROGRAM, ) ) Respondents. ) ___________________________________)

Opinion filed February 1, 2017.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Katherine G. Essrig, Judge.

S.K., pro se.

Mary Jennifer Arena and Cynthia Lakeman of the Law Offices of Cynthia Lakeman, P.A., Tampa, for Respondent K.K.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mary Soorus, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Respondent Department of Children and Families.

Matthew C. Wilson, Sanford, for Respondent Guardian ad Litem Program. PER CURIAM.

Dismissed in part and denied in part.

CASANUEVA, KELLY, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

S.K. v. K.K., (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

S.K. v. K.K. (S.K. v. K.K.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.