S.K. v. Department of Children & Families

839 So. 2d 876, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 3140
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 12, 2003
DocketNo. 4D01-5027
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 839 So. 2d 876 (S.K. v. Department of Children & Families) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
S.K. v. Department of Children & Families, 839 So. 2d 876, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 3140 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find that the entry of a default and the trial court’s denial of the father’s motion to vacate the default judgment terminating his parental rights was an abuse of discretion. Rule 8.270 provides that “[o]n motion and upon such terms as are just, the court may relieve a party or the party’s legal representative from an order, judgment, or proceeding for the following reasons: Mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect.” Fla. R. Juv. P. 8.270(1). We find that the father demonstrated at least one of these reasons.

REVERSED.

FARMER, STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Strulowitz v. CADLE COMPANY. II, INC.
839 So. 2d 876 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
839 So. 2d 876, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 3140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sk-v-department-of-children-families-fladistctapp-2003.