S.K. Mortgage Holdings Ltd. Partnership v. Subirats

28 A.D.3d 461, 811 N.Y.S.2d 594

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an amended judgment of foreclosure and sale of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jones, Jr., J.), entered May 10, 2005, as awarded the plaintiff the amount of any deficiency against the defendants in the event the proceeds of the foreclosure sale were insufficient to pay the amount owed to the plaintiff.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in amending the judgment of foreclosure and sale in awarding the plaintiff the amount of any deficiency against the defendants in the event the proceeds of the foreclosure sale were insufficient to pay the amount owed to the plaintiff {see Pines at Setauket v Retirement Mgt. Group, [462]*462246 AD2d 528 [1998]; Poughkeepsie Sav. Bank, FSB v Maple-wood Land Dev. Co., 210 AD2d 606 [1994]; Security Pac. Mtge. & Real Estate Servs., Inc. v Herald Ctr. Ltd., 731 F Supp 605 [1990]). Krausman, J.P., Mastro, Fisher and Covello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

S.K. Mortgage Holdings Ltd. Partnership v. Subirats, 28 A.D.3d 461, 811 N.Y.S.2d 594 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

28 A.D.3d 461 (S.K. Mortgage Holdings Ltd. Partnership v. Subirats) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Poughkeepsie Savings Bank, FSB v. Maplewood Land Development Co.
210 A.D.2d 606 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Pines at Setauket, Inc. v. Retirement Management Group Inc.
246 A.D.2d 528 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)