Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Sizemore v. State

Sizemore v. State

395 S.E.2d 669, 195 Ga. App. 548, 1990 Ga. App. LEXIS 595
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 8, 1990·No. A90A1120·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Deen, Presiding Judge.

The appellant, Johnny Sizemore, was convicted of driving with a suspended license. In this pro se appeal, Sizemore does not clearly state an enumeration of error, but he seems to contend that the evidence did not support his conviction.

The trial was not reported, and there is no transcript. In the absence of a transcript, or a record prepared from recollection or a stipulation of the case pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-41 (g, i), we cannot consider enumerations of error based on the evidence. Dean v. State, 188 Ga. App. 128 (372 SE2d 286) (1988). Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Pope and Beasley, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sizemore v. State, 395 S.E.2d 669, 195 Ga. App. 548, 1990 Ga. App. LEXIS 595 (Ga. Ct. App. 1990).

395 S.E.2d 669 (Sizemore v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gary v. State
526 S.E.2d 148 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1999)
Hageman v. State
423 S.E.2d 56 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1992)
Perry v. City of Hampton
409 S.E.2d 92 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1991)
Williams v. State
406 S.E.2d 498 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1991)