Sizemore v. State
This text of 395 S.E.2d 669 (Sizemore v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant, Johnny Sizemore, was convicted of driving with a suspended license. In this pro se appeal, Sizemore does not clearly state an enumeration of error, but he seems to contend that the evidence did not support his conviction.
The trial was not reported, and there is no transcript. In the absence of a transcript, or a record prepared from recollection or a stipulation of the case pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-41 (g, i), we cannot consider enumerations of error based on the evidence. Dean v. State, 188 Ga. App. 128 (372 SE2d 286) (1988). Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court must be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
395 S.E.2d 669, 195 Ga. App. 548, 1990 Ga. App. LEXIS 595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sizemore-v-state-gactapp-1990.