Sizemore v. State

737 So. 2d 1155, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8546, 1999 WL 426460
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 25, 1999·No. No. 99-460·Published

Opinion

ANTOON, J.

G.H. Sizemore appeals the order entered by the trial court denying his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 3.850 of the Florida Rules of Criminal [1156] Procedure. He contends in part that he is entitled to receive postconviction relief because an improperly recalculated sentencing guidelines scoresheet was used by the trial court. This claim is not rebutted by the attachments filed with this court. Therefore, we remand this matter to permit the trial court to further address Mr. Sizemore’s claim by either providing an attachment which supports the scoresheet calculation or conducting an evidentiary hearing in accordance with Guinto v. State, 693 So.2d 46, 48 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Mr. Sizemore’s other claims for postconviction relief are without merit.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED and REMANDED in part.

DAUKSCH and W. SHARP, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sizemore v. State, 737 So. 2d 1155, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 8546, 1999 WL 426460 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

737 So. 2d 1155 (Sizemore v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Guinto v. State
693 So. 2d 46 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)